Ask a focused question
A useful case begins with something answerable: a birthplace conflict, an unknown parent, or the identity behind two records—not “finish the family tree.”
Kin Resolve is being shaped around disciplined, source-aware research. It helps organize the argument; it does not certify conclusions or replace professional judgment.

A strong conclusion explains which sources were consulted, how conflicts were handled, why the evidence fits, and where uncertainty remains. Kin Resolve gives that reasoning a durable home beside the tree.
Fictional demo: every Hartwell–Mercer name, date, place, record, photograph, story, and DNA match used in examples is invented.
A useful case begins with something answerable: a birthplace conflict, an unknown parent, or the identity behind two records—not “finish the family tree.”
Record what a source actually says before explaining what you believe it means. The conclusion should never erase the observation.
Conflicting dates and places are part of the evidence. Preserve them, compare their quality, and explain why one carries more weight.
Shared DNA can support or challenge a documentary theory. It does not name an ancestor by itself, and a match score is not proof.
Confidence belongs with the conclusion. “Probably,” “possibly,” and “not yet resolved” are useful research states—not product failures.
The private workspace can hold ambiguity and sensitive material. Public history should reflect an intentional, privacy-aware review.
Cases, evidence items, hypotheses, tasks, confidence values, source-coverage checks, and date-conflict checks are implemented in the source product. Hosted access remains a proposed, gated cohort.
Explicit search checklists, forced conflict review, citation templates, confidence categories, semantic retrieval, and the grounded research agent remain roadmap work.
Kin Resolve can help you organize a defensible conclusion. It cannot make an incomplete search exhaustive or turn an inference into proof.
We’re looking for family historians willing to test GEDCOM review, source, research-case, deterministic-check, and export workflows. Apply with the workflow—not private records.